Question: In 1995 the Radiological Society of North America awarded the
first Roentgen Centennial Commemorative Medal to you – how did you react to
this? What does this mean to you?
JC:
I was pleased to be chosen but I realized that many others are equally or
more deserving. An example is Hal Anger, the inventor of the Gamma Camera.
He has not gotten the recognition he deserves. I don't display my plaques
and honors. They are hidden behind a black curtain in my work room at home.
I would gladly trade any honorary award for the chance to give a lecture to
the ACR or RSNA. Too many radiologists still believe there is a risk from a
chest x-ray. Few radiologists can explain radiation to the patient in words
the patient can understand. I am pleased that I helped reduce this problem
by promoting the BERT approach.
Ed: Find out more about the BERT approach in our
Medical Physics section
Question: Public perception of this career?
(I am aware that in the USA, the perception
may be different)
JC: Since medical physicists are a small
fraction of the population, it is understandable that the profession is not
well known. In the U.S. it is a well paid profession. When I retired in 1986
my top salary had just reached $50,000/year. It was adequate for our needs.
Many new medical physicists start at that salary. It doesn't bother me.
Contributions of John Cameron/Philanthropy
My wife and I have managed to give away money to worthy projects. For
example in 1985 we started Medical Physics Publishing (MPP) a nonprofit
publisher. We gave over USD100,000 spread over ten years to establish MPP.
Now it is doing well thanks to three competent women!
I
have devoted much time and energy to helping medical physics in developing
countries. I gave numerous QC courses in Spanish or Portuguese to students
in Latin America. In October 1954 we returned from two years in Brazil where
I did nuclear physics. In 1969 I started the ABFM- the Brazilian Medical
Physics Association. I have enjoyed learning about other cultures and
helping where I can.
Question:
Comparison of the field today and where it was when you began?
JC:
There are now over 5,000 medical physicists in the U.S more than 50 times
the number in 1958. The growth of technology is such that it is not possible
today for a nuclear physicist to switch into medical physics without
training. The field is now much more technical. More training is needed to
do the job.
With
complex equipment medical physicists have to be well trained – otherwise and
especially in radiation oncology (radiation therapy), death may be the
outcome. I have seen this happen before where I was helping to train medical
physicists in a developing country.
Question: Would you encourage people to take up this profession? What or
how would you advise those who are contemplating taking up this profession?
JC:
I would not encourage everyone to take up
this profession. Not everyone is suited for any particular field. If someone
is interested in medicine and also in physics and they like working with
people and communicate well with others, I would strongly encourage them.
It
is underpaid and not as satisfying in developing countries where the
radiologists and radiation oncologists are not as aware for the need for
good medical physicists to do good imaging and good radiation therapy.
Question: Future plans or what you would like to see in your profession
- with regards to growth and development, recognition…
JC:
I have long been convinced that medical physicists (and biomedical
engineers) have useful roles to play in many clinical and basic science
departments of medical schools. For example, there are very few physicists
working in the research area I call the physics of physiology. Many Nobel
Prizes are awaiting good research to understand and explain the many
mysteries of our bodies, such as the basic mechanism of memory or
imagination.
See
my article: Cameron J.R. A proposed model of
imagination and creativity Wisconsin Academy Review Vol. 34, No. 3 pp33-36
June 1988
I
hope to expand on that article and change the title to "Origin of Ideas."
My model is analogous to our present understanding of the Origin of Species.
In producing new species, "genetic noise" (i.e., mutations) provide the
basic mechanism for a change.
Perhaps in 50 years they will refer to "Cameron's Origin of Ideas". The
driving mechanism is "brain noise" (i.e., random action potentials which I
call "subconscious imagination") that produces new combinations of stored
knowledge in our memory. Our subconscious mind monitors the results of any
new combinations to see if any of them solve an old problem. Once a useful
combination is recognized it is stored in the subconscious mind.
Einstein said he first thought of his relativity idea while riding his
bicycle. I know many other examples. I still hope to find a biological
scientist to test some of the basic ideas of my model of imagination and
creativity.
Find out more about John Cameron at the Physics Department, University of
Wisconsin Website
http://www.medphysics.wisc.edu/cameron/index.html
|